// FUNCTIONS / LEGAL

AI your general counsel would stand behind.

Legal can't accept an answer it can’t cite. Our legal programs are built on one standard: every finding traces to an approved source, privilege and confidentiality stay protected, and legal judgment stays with lawyers.

Running a law firm? See our professional-services programs →
FROM OUR WORK

A Big Four professional-services firm brought Flatiron in to run AI fluency workshops for every employee. Confidentiality and accuracy are part of every role there.

Ask about legal programs →
// PHOTO PLACEHOLDERIn-house lawyers reviewing a contract against an AI-drafted issues listWide photo, 1320×520 · /photos/function-legal.jpg
A colleague leaning in to review work with a teammate at her laptop

The work we train on

Recurring legal work done to your playbook.

  1. 01Contract review against your playbook
  2. 02First drafts of NDAs, templates and standard agreements
  3. 03Intake triage and answers to routine business questions
  4. 04Policy and precedent research grounded in approved sources
  5. 05Due-diligence, investigation and litigation document synthesis
  6. 06Knowledge management and recurring legal communications

One use case, three labs

Contract review against your playbook, from idea to production.

01
Leadership Lab

Decide where AI changes legal service

The general counsel's team identifies where AI changes turnaround times, outside-counsel spend, risk coverage and team capacity, and picks contract review as a 90-day priority.

Legal capacity map and 90-day goals

02
Activation Lab

Build a contract-review skill

Lawyers and contract managers package a skill that takes an incoming agreement, compares each clause to your approved playbook positions, separates standard terms from deviations, and drafts an issues summary in your format.

Tested skill, shared with the team

03
Builder Lab

Run it on every inbound contract

A recurring workflow takes contracts from your intake channel, runs the playbook check, drafts the issues list, flags high-risk deviations and routes each one to the responsible lawyer.

Pilot workflow with baseline vs. pilot results

// HOW WE JUDGE THE WORK

Graded against a legal rubric, not a completion bar.

Every skill and workflow is tested before it’s shared, using non-standard clauses, missing terms, conflicting precedent and cross-jurisdiction questions. We red-team for confident but unsupported legal answers and for citations that don’t exist.

Legal accuracy
Conclusions match the source text and current law
Citation integrity
Every clause or authority cited exists and says what's claimed
Playbook alignment
Deviations flagged against approved positions
Confidentiality
Privileged and client information stays protected
Human oversight
Legal judgment and sign-off stay with lawyers
Reviewer effort
Less time checking, not more

Who's in the room

A builder and a legal leader, teaching together.

Technical instructor
Experienced with skills, projects, connectors and document workflows in your platform. Runs the labs and troubleshooting.
Legal practitioner
A general counsel, senior in-house lawyer or legal-operations leader, with a privacy or regulatory specialist as needed. Judges whether the output would survive review.
Your team
Privacy, information security, knowledge management and AI governance step in where their approval is needed.

Start with your legal leadership team.

A Leadership Lab configured for legal: four hours, your problems, a 90-day plan.

Book a Leadership Lab